Join EOSC-A in helping to shape the future European Partnership portfolio

What is the consultation?

The European Commission opened a public consultation on 10 July 2026, titled: Single Basic Act for Joint Undertakings and thematic priorities for the European Partnership portfolio in Horizon Europe 2028–2034. Although the title refers to Joint Undertakings, Section 2 of the questionnaire concerns the thematic priorities and overall design of the future European Partnership portfolio, and is directly relevant to the future of EOSC. The consultation will close on 16 October 2026.

Why this is important for EOSC

As you knowEOSC-A’s primary position is that EOSC should continue under Horizon Europe 2028–2034 (also known as the EU’s 10th Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, or FP10) as a distinct Work Programme-based European Partnership. The consultation provides an important opportunity for the EOSC-A membership and the wider EOSC community to make the case — as either an individual, on behalf of an organisation, or both — for research data, digital infrastructures, and European-scale research excellence to be recognised as strategic thematic priorities for the future Partnership portfolio, and for EOSC to be the distinct Work Programme-based Partnership through which this cross-cutting European capability is further developed and sustained.

What EOSC-A is asking you to do

EOSC-A encourages its membership and other EOSC stakeholders to complete the consultation, with particular attention paid to Section 2 (“Questions on the Horizon Europe 2028–2034 partnerships portfolio”). One may complete the consultation on behalf of their organisation (if authorised to do so), as an individual, or both separately. 

To make participation as straightforward as possible, EOSC-A has prepared recommended responses to the open-text questions in this section. These texts reflect the Association’s previously agreed, consensus-based positions, including support for EOSC as a distinct Work Programme-based European Partnership under Horizon Europe 2028–2034.

We invite you to use the proposed responses, which are previewed below, by copying and pasting them into the corresponding open text field boxes of Questions 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Section 2 of the consultation. In the case of Question 1, please select the “Other” category to insert the accompanying text. Questions 2.1, 3.1, and 4.1 are not strictly relevant to this initiative, and should be answered on your own account or indicated as “not applicable”.

Consultation preview

Section 1: Questions about Treaty-based partnerships in Horizon Europe 28-34

This section of the consultation is not strictly relevant to the question of a future EOSC Partnership, but does reflect on some aspects of EOSC’s policy agenda. We have therefore made suggestion for how to answer these questions in a manner that may help to advance that agenda.

The full text of Section 1, including the suggested multiple-choice selections, is provided in the Annex to the EOSC-A briefing document:

If you would prefer to move quickly through the section without addressing these questions, the final option in each list of choices is “Cannot say”.

Section 2: Questions on the Horizon Europe 28-34 partnerships portfolio

The proposed EOSC-A responses to Questions 1-4 are intended for direct use in the questionnaire. Questions 2.1, 3.1, and 4.1 have been deemed NOT APPLICABLE.


Question 1 – In your opinion, what is fundamentally needed in the portfolio building process and resulting portfolio of European partnerships?

A clear strategic rationale behind the design of the portfolio
Coherent structuring of the thematic areas to be addressed by partnerships, avoiding overlaps and fragmentation
A value chain approach exploring synergies and interdependencies within specific industrial ecosystems
A balanced mix of stability (long-term structuring) and agility (ability to evolve)
Improved efficiency compared to the current landscape
A selection of fewer sectorial and synergetic partnerships selected competitively
None of the above, satisfied with the status quo
xOther (specify below)

Please specify here:

Proposed text from EOSC-A:

Active engagement of Member States and Associated Countries should be a fundamental consideration in the portfolio-building process. European Partnerships are most effective when they provide a framework through which European and national priorities, investments, and capabilities can be aligned around shared objectives, while recognising different levels of readiness and capacity across countries.

The resulting portfolio should therefore incentivise broad and meaningful participation of Member States and Associated Countries, including through transparent and flexible modalities for financial and in-kind contributions. This is essential to strengthen European ownership, avoid uneven participation and ensure that partnerships create durable structuring effects beyond individual EU-funded projects. It also enables national investments and infrastructures to contribute to, and benefit from, common European capabilities.

For cross-cutting initiatives such as the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC), this engagement is particularly important. The EOSC Federation is inherently distributed, bringing together national, thematic, and e-infrastructure resources while preserving their ownership and autonomy. Sustained participation by Member States and Associated Countries is therefore indispensable to building a resilient, inclusive, and genuinely European research data ecosystem, and to ensuring that researchers across Europe can contribute to and benefit from shared FAIR data, services ,and infrastructures.

The portfolio should therefore preserve EOSC’s distinct horizontal role, with balanced tripartite governance involving the European Commission, participating states, and the research community represented by the EOSC Association. This will maximise the return on previous public investments and ensure that sectoral partnerships can build on a coherent European research data foundation rather than creating parallel and fragmented solutions.

References: 

  • Council Recommendation of 24 June 2025 on the European Research Area Policy Agenda 2025-2027 — Priority Area 1: Deepening a truly functioning internal market for knowledge
  • European Strategy on Research and Technology Infrastructures (EU)
  • AI Continent Action Plan (EU)
  • European Strategy for AI in Science (EU)
  • Apply AI Strategy (EU)
  • Data Union Strategy (EU)
  • Much more than a market (Enrico Letta et al.)
  • Align, Act, Accelerate: Research, technology and innovation to boost European competitiveness (Heitor et al.)
  • The future of European competitiveness: Report by Mario Draghi (EU)

Question 2 – What are thematics* for which intervention through a European Partnership is essential, where the European Union’s current and potential standing in the thematic area can be consolidated where strong relative to global competitors, including research excellence, industrial competitiveness, strategic autonomy, and ability to influence international standards and norms.

*Thematics are policy-relevant themes or domains to be addressed through partnerships under Horizon Europe 28-34. Thematics reflect strategic R&I priorities, but do not necessarily require a stand-alone partnership. A thematic may be addressed by one or more partnerships. If a thematic area is not considered suitable for a partnership, either because it does not meet the criteria or is not prioritised, it may still be addressed through other Horizon Europe 28-34 instruments, including regular Work Programme calls. The absence of a partnership therefore does not imply a lack of funding opportunities.

Please justify:

Proposed text from EOSC-A:

A thematic for which intervention through a European Partnership is essential is support for research excellence on a European rather than national scale. Europe’s ability to remain globally competitive increasingly depends on enabling researchers to work seamlessly across borders, disciplines, and infrastructures, and to access and combine the knowledge, data, tools, and services required for excellent science irrespective of where these resources are located.

A core element of this thematic is the development of a trusted, secure, and sovereign European research data ecosystem, including FAIR research data and services, Open Science, interoperability, and the data foundations required for AI-enabled science. European-level intervention provides a demonstrable strategic advantage that cannot be achieved as effectively through fragmented national or purely project-based actions. This should be implemented through a distinct Work Programme-based European Partnership for the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC).

Europe has already established a strong position through sustained European and national investment in research infrastructures, repositories, services, and the EOSC Federation. The next Framework Programme should consolidate this position by moving EOSC from a developing initiative to a durable, production-grade European capability. The EOSC Federation brings distributed nationally and community-owned resources together into an interoperable research commons while preserving ownership and autonomy. It enables long-term, secure, and trustworthy access to high-quality FAIR research data, strengthens reproducibility and cross-border collaboration, and operationalises the Common European Data Space for Research and Innovation.

This capability is also indispensable to Europe’s competitiveness and strategic autonomy. By supplying large, diverse, and machine-actionable FAIR datasets, with provenance, interoperability, and trusted access conditions, EOSC provides the research data backbone for responsible AI in science. It complements EuroHPC, RAISE, Research Infrastructures, and other Common European Data Spaces, while supporting the free circulation of knowledge across Europe. Consolidating EOSC through a distinct Partnership will protect past investments, avoid fragmentation, and strengthen Europe’s capacity to deliver research excellence at European scale and to shape international practices around FAIR data, interoperability, trust, and Open Science.

References: 

  • Council Recommendation of 24 June 2025 on the European Research Area Policy Agenda 2025-2027 — Priority Area 1: Deepening a truly functioning internal market for knowledge
  • European Strategy on Research and Technology Infrastructures (EU)
  • AI Continent Action Plan (EU)
  • European Strategy for AI in Science (EU)
  • Apply AI Strategy (EU)
  • Data Union Strategy (EU)
  • Much more than a market (Enrico Letta et al.)
  • Align, Act, Accelerate: Research, technology and innovation to boost European competitiveness (Heitor et al.)
  • The future of European competitiveness: Report by Mario Draghi (EU)

Question 3 – What are thematics for which intervention through a European Partnership is essential, where the European Union’s current and potential standing in the thematic area can be strengthened where weak relative to global competitors, including research excellence, industrial competitiveness, strategic autonomy, and ability to influence international standards and norms.

Please justify:

Proposed text from EOSC-A:

A thematic where European Partnership intervention is essential to strengthen Europe’s position is the trusted data foundation for artificial intelligence and data-intensive science. Europe faces a growing innovation gap in AI, including limited access to high-quality, trustworthy, and reusable data at the scale needed for advanced research. At the same time, geopolitical and commercial dependencies on non-European platforms create vulnerabilities for access to critical research data and services.

A distinct Work Programme-based European Partnership for the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) would directly address these weaknesses by pooling fragmented national capacities, creating critical mass, coordinating investments, and establishing common standards and governance frameworks. This is particularly important where Europe risks becoming dependent on infrastructures, technologies or standards developed elsewhere. By federating European research data, services, and infrastructures through the EOSC Federation, and making high-quality FAIR resources discoverable, accessible, and machine-actionable, EOSC reduces data scarcity and gives researchers a trusted environment in which to develop and use AI-enabled methods. Provenance, interoperability and reproducibility are embedded into the EOSC approach, helping to mitigate black-box risks and enabling responsible and scientifically credible AI outputs.

For research data and digital infrastructures in particular, the objective should not simply be to catch up technologically, but to ensure that Europe can develop and control the infrastructures, data, and standards that underpin future research and innovation. 

EOSC should operate in close coordination with EuroHPC and RAISE so that Europe’s investments in data, compute and AI function as a coherent capability. EOSC provides the AI-enhanced research data and services layer; EuroHPC provides high-performance and quantum computing; and RAISE supports AI-focused capabilities and uptake. Strengthening these links, while preserving EOSC’s distinct governance and budgetary autonomy, will reinforce European strategic autonomy, improve the scientific usability of Europe’s digital investments, and enable Europe to play a stronger role in shaping global norms for interoperability, data governance, trustworthy AI and responsible research.

References: 

  • Council Recommendation of 24 June 2025 on the European Research Area Policy Agenda 2025-2027 — Priority Area 1: Deepening a truly functioning internal market for knowledge
  • European Strategy on Research and Technology Infrastructures (EU)
  • AI Continent Action Plan (EU)
  • European Strategy for AI in Science (EU)
  • Apply AI Strategy (EU)
  • Data Union Strategy (EU)
  • Much more than a market (Enrico Letta et al.)
  • Align, Act, Accelerate: Research, technology and innovation to boost European competitiveness (Heitor et al.)
  • The future of European competitiveness: Report by Mario Draghi (EU)

Question 4 – What are thematics for which intervention through a European Partnership is essential in order to address major societal, environmental, or systemic challenges of European relevance, where coordinated action at EU level is necessary to achieve sufficient scale, long-term structuring effects or cross-sectoral integration that could not be achieved effectively through fragmented national approaches alone?

Please justify:

Proposed text from EOSC-A:

A thematic for which European Partnership intervention is essential to address major societal, environmental, and systemic challenges is the cross-border and cross-disciplinary sharing and reuse of trusted research data, software, workflows, and services. Challenges such as climate change, health, an ageing society, and rising inequality cannot be addressed effectively across fragmented disciplinary, institutional, or national infrastructures. They require political and technical coordination in order to access diverse data and research resources and combine them across domains and borders at European scale.

The European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) provides the horizontal infrastructure needed for this coordination. Through the EOSC Federation, national, thematic, and e-infrastructure resources can be connected into a distributed but coherent environment in which researchers can discover, access, and reuse FAIR resources under trusted conditions. This strengthens interdisciplinary collaboration, reduces duplication of infrastructure and effort, and allows previous public investments, in particular at the national level, to grow into interoperable capabilities that can be used across Europe.

A distinct Work Programme-based European Partnership for EOSC is essential to achieve the necessary long-term structuring effect. It provides a shared European implementation framework for interoperability, security, trust, FAIR data, and Open Science while enabling Member States and research communities to contribute according to their capacities. EOSC also acts as the cross-cutting Common European Data Space for Research and Innovation, connecting research outputs with other Common European Data Spaces and supporting the EU Single Market for knowledge. Fragmented national approaches alone cannot deliver this level of cross-border interoperability, resilience, scale, and sustained coordination.

References: 

  • Council Recommendation of 24 June 2025 on the European Research Area Policy Agenda 2025-2027 — Priority Area 1: Deepening a truly functioning internal market for knowledge
  • European Strategy on Research and Technology Infrastructures (EU)
  • AI Continent Action Plan (EU)
  • European Strategy for AI in Science (EU)
  • Apply AI Strategy (EU)
  • Data Union Strategy (EU)
  • Much more than a market (Enrico Letta et al.)
  • Align, Act, Accelerate: Research, technology and innovation to boost European competitiveness (Heitor et al.)
  • The future of European competitiveness: Report by Mario Draghi (EU)

Section 3: Questions about the respondent’s involvement in European Partnerships

If applicable, please indicate your participation in the current European Open Science Cloud Partnership by selecting it in the list of partnerships at the bottom of the page. 

All EOSC-A Members and Observers are considered as participating in the EOSC Partnership as a “partnership member”.



How to participate

  1. Open the European Commission consultation page on its Have Your Say portal: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/16413-Horizon-Europe-European-Partnerships-to-be-implemented-as-joint-undertakings/public-consultation_en
  2. Select the option to respond to the questionnaire and sign in with EU Login or eID. If you do not have an EU Login account, use the “Register” link to create one.
  3. Complete all mandatory survey fields in the “About you” section. Note that you must choose whether your submission is “Anonymous” or “Public”.
  4. Proceed to Section 1: “Questions about Treaty-based partnerships in Horizon Europe 28-34”, where you may take the EOSC-A recommendations in the Annex to this document, select “Cannot say”, or answer the questions on your own account.
  5. Proceed to Section 2: “Questions on the Horizon Europe 2028–2034 partnerships portfolio”, where you can copy and paste the proposed EOSC-A responses into the corresponding open-text fields.
  6. Proceed to Section 3 and complete the mandatory fields. If applicable, please indicate your participation in the current European Open Science Cloud Partnership by selecting it in the list at the bottom of the page.
  7. Submit the completed consultation by 16 October 2026.