HomeEOSCEOSC Macro-RoadmapImplementation challengesFAIR metrics & certification
Use case The Polish Medical Research Agency has invested over €100 million to establish 19 Regional Digital Medicine Centres (RDMCs),... Read more
The main goals of the Workshop were to analyse the current situation and the perspectives in the productivity of FAIR... Read more
The FAIR Assessment Dashboard is a collection of tools for software developers at science clusters to assess and monitor the... Read more
Case study Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS), the Dutch national centre of expertise and repository for research data, launched... Read more
Use case The Open Science Lab at the Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology supports cultural heritage institutions and... Read more
This paper updates the initial assertions and recommendations of the task force based on feedback received during the consultation process... Read more
This paper is a digest of and conclusion to the work of the EOSC Association’s Long Term Data Preservation Task... Read more
This report provides recommendations to guide current and future actions towards data and service level interoperability—enabling seamless exchange and integration... Read more
The report on FAIR Evaluation community survey underscores the importance of harmonizing FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) assessments across... Read more
This report by the FAIR Metrics subgroup addresses critical issues surrounding the adoption and impact of FAIRness metrics, essential for... Read more
The scale of (meta)data collected by researchers of all kinds is vast. Identifying and providing basic storage and access for... Read more
The document delineates a data quality framework for varied research domains, establishing criteria and standards for data quality. By uniting... Read more
