HomeEOSCEOSC Macro-RoadmapImplementation challengesFAIR metrics & certification
Use case The Open Science Lab at the Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology supports cultural heritage institutions and... Read more
This paper updates the initial assertions and recommendations of the task force based on feedback received during the consultation process... Read more
This paper is a digest of and conclusion to the work of the EOSC Association’s Long Term Data Preservation Task... Read more
This report provides recommendations to guide current and future actions towards data and service level interoperability—enabling seamless exchange and integration... Read more
The report on FAIR Evaluation community survey underscores the importance of harmonizing FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) assessments across... Read more
This report by the FAIR Metrics subgroup addresses critical issues surrounding the adoption and impact of FAIRness metrics, essential for... Read more
The scale of (meta)data collected by researchers of all kinds is vast. Identifying and providing basic storage and access for... Read more
The document delineates a data quality framework for varied research domains, establishing criteria and standards for data quality. By uniting... Read more
The report emphasises the need for standardisation in FAIR assessment tools to provide consistent and reliable evaluations of research data’s... Read more
This work is pivotal for the research landscape as it addresses the gap in FAIRness assessment accuracy and reproducibility. It... Read more
FAIR-IMPACT will build on the outputs of the RDA/ReSA/FORCE11 FAIR for Research Software WG and existing guidelines & metrics for research software to adapt and enhance the FAIR...
FAIR-IMPACT supports development of guidelines and mechanisms improving connections between repository registries and discovery portals (including EOSC Portal), repository trustworthiness mechanisms (e.g. CoreTrustSeal) and FAIR digital object assessments.
